This report presents the key insights and conclusions from an international expert panel on ethical issues related to artificial intelligence, organized as part of the Erasmus+ project MEANS 2.0.
The session brought together professionals from across Europe—including Spain, Estonia, Romania, Portugal, Poland, and Bulgaria—to explore the ethical challenges and opportunities that AI presents, particularly for entrepreneurs and migrant communities.
A central theme of the discussion was the definition of responsible AI. Experts agreed that it must be grounded in trust, transparency, and accountability.
Entrepreneurs are encouraged to maintain ownership over their ideas, even when using AI tools for support. While AI can assist in drafting business plans or proposals, the “essence” of the work should remain human-driven. Transparency about AI usage is also essential.
Accountability was identified as the most critical ethical competence. It applies across all levels—from students to experienced professionals—and ensures that individuals remain responsible for the outputs they produce with AI.
Additionally, critical thinking is vital. Users must actively evaluate AI-generated content to identify biases, inaccuracies, and misleading information.
The panel placed strong emphasis on the role of AI in migrant entrepreneurship, recognizing both its transformative potential and its risks.
On the positive side, AI can serve as a powerful “launching ramp.” It supports translation, market research, and navigation of complex legal systems in unfamiliar countries. This enables migrants to save time and explore sectors where they may initially lack expertise.
However, experts warned about the risk of skill gaps. Over-reliance on AI may prevent individuals from developing essential competencies, leaving them vulnerable if access to such tools is lost.
Another concern is inaccurate or outdated information, particularly regarding legal and labor regulations. Migrant entrepreneurs, who may lack local context, are especially at risk of acting on incorrect data.
The issue of misrepresentation was also highlighted. Using AI to generate CVs or motivation letters in a language one does not actually speak can lead to serious consequences, including reputational damage or exclusion from the labor market.
Data privacy emerged as a major concern, with many users unaware of how their data is stored or used after being input into AI systems.
Experts noted that European AI tools are generally more secure due to stricter regulatory frameworks, while tools from other regions may present higher exposure risks.
A key recommendation is for entrepreneurs to clearly distinguish between personal and sensitive business data. Training should emphasize the importance of anonymizing documents—removing identifiable information—before uploading them to AI tools for translation or analysis.
The panel raised concerns about the potential erosion of human creativity and independent thinking due to excessive reliance on AI.
AI should be treated as an assistant, not a replacement. Humans must remain actively involved in reviewing, adapting, and making final decisions.
There is also a growing risk that overuse of AI could weaken essential skills such as writing, communication, and contextual understanding. Maintaining these abilities is critical for long-term professional growth.
The experts proposed several priorities for the development of training materials within the MEANS 2.0 project:
The panel concluded that artificial intelligence holds immense potential to foster inclusion, innovation, and efficiency. However, its use must be carefully balanced with human judgment, ethical awareness, and legal understanding.
Ultimately, responsible AI use is not just about technology—it is about ensuring that human values remain at the center of innovation.
Funded by the European Union. Views and opinions expressed are however those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or the European Education and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA). Neither the European Union nor EACEA can be held responsible for them.
© Means2.0 Consortium. All Rights Reserved
Get notified about new articles